1) Introduction – what is the report about and how does it intersect with your positionality? What do you want to change and why? How does it relate to your academic practice?
In this report I will reflect on limitations of in my initial attempt at an intervention. I have drafted a new intervention since. But I am focussing on the learning from the second draft of my first attempt (with padlet).
I want to make archives much more inclusive places. I have found them intimidating spaces in the past, and occasionally, still do. Legacies of colonialism, exploitation and political power are still with us in collections. They persist in policies and practices in archives too.
In my initial attempt, I did not fully follow the instructions for considering a particular intersectional experience (Crenshaw, 1990). And so will try to reflect on that, and ways forward.
2) Context – what is the (teaching/learning support) context for the intervention? What practice, course or department are you in and what is the proposed utility of this intervention?
I work in the Archives and Special Collections Centre at UAL. I conceived the intervention for one of our existing teaching activities: our one-off teaching sessions within courses. We introduce students to our service and what an archive is. We raise awareness of archival bias to consider when researching (Rolph-Trouillot, 1995). The sessions tend to be 1-2 hours.
Sometimes course cohorts can be large, e.g. 50, or even 100 students. The structure starts with 30 mins delivery within slides to everyone. Then we run sessions with smaller groups, so students can handle archive material directly.
We introduce the concept of ‘archival bias’ in the talk, then handling activities may build on it. I hoped to enhance our introductory talk, by a group activity around this involving case studies, rather than just delivery from slides. I thought using Padlet could help to facilitate.
3) Inclusive learning – why is inclusion/inclusivity important within your discipline? What is the rationale for your intervention design (based on relevant theory)?
We want to encourage students towards inclusive and critical research. Highlighting archival bias/ silences helps reconsider evidence: whose perspective it is from, who it is serving. Teaching can be a space where we can question the “authority” of the archive. (Grout, 2019)
My rationale focused on design of group activities, as the necessary basis for inclusivity.
- Reflecting on my intervention, as if it were to help students with ADHD:
Active learning with group work is recommended (Hughes et al., 2022) for students with ADHD to process information. I wanted to structure and chunk information. (CADDRA, 2020; Hughes et al, 2022). Students also find concept-mapping tools (CADDRA, 2020) useful.
Assigning roles within the peer group such as note-taking (Tyrone, 2020; Hughes et. al, 2022) can help reduce “executive load” for ADHD students. The Padlet served as an asynchronous learning tool (Hughes et al., 2022), that students could refer to later.
4) Reflection – what supported your thinking in deciding on this intervention? What feedback did you receive from peers/other colleagues? What were some of the key decisions? Did you encounter any challenges? Did you identify any potential risks?
The intervention did not clearly centre one intersectional student experience. I tried to address too many experiences. This may have served none. Or, worse, in attempting ‘balance’, from a CRT perspective, perhaps I even supported ‘systemic whiteness’ (Bradbury, 2020).
I should have focussed on ‘Challenge 3’ but more specifically: for students with ADHD. I should then have intersected it with another student experience. Tim suggested by focusing on a particular intersectional experience/need, we may help other students too. Supporting the Social Model of Disability approach (Oliver, 2004), taken up more recently in the ‘Universal Design for Learning’ (Hughes et al., 2022).
In Garrett’s account (2024), of Black and/or racialised Phd students’ experience at university, one student account struck me. Her intersectional identity, as both Black AND neurodivergent was erased. Other examples from Garret highlighted material and cultural reasons why racialised students who live with ADHD conditions may go un-diagnosed.
Attainment gap statistics for Black students are a recognised concern. Failure to consider the needs of ADHD students in general might affect Black students in terms of attainment.1
Padlet might be beneficial in many contexts for ADHD. However, there might be a risk in the intervention. It might place more of a load on executive function, by asking to switch between group discussion and the Padlet space. Working on paper or a hands-on activity might be better. In presentation with peers, they agreed.2
Group work is important for all students, especially students with ADHD (Hughes, et al). But my focus on this, might reflect something Leah Cox observed regarding ‘pedagogies of discomfort’: Teachers tended to state concern about the internal ‘dynamics’ of the student group, rather than reflect on their own feelings/positionality. (Cox, 2025).
Engaging creative learning is a recognised strategy for ADHD students (ADCET, n.d.). This is particularly relevant in our creative context. I was encouraged by Tim to also consider how the form of the intervention might better ‘dramatise’ the experience of ADHD.
I wanted to speak more directly to aspects of Black identity as well. I am conscious of my own positionality as white, without lived experience. But it is burdensome on those with lived experience only, to be tasked with making systemically ‘white’ spaces more inclusive.
5) Action – How do you propose that this intervention be used and what might this mean for your personal academic practice and your work context?
I am disinclined to use the original intervention as it is. But working on it and receiving feedback will help me to reflect and develop alternatives. The new intervention I drafted might be something to build on. It came out of further thinking, reading and listening in this unit, since the initial intervention.
How to better centre ADHD
Students with ADHD may experience fragmentary memory and attention (Hood, 2018). They may benefit from hands-on activity. (Hughes et al, 2020; ADCET, nd; CADDRA, 2022). Peers suggested the workshop might allow ‘chaos’ in the centre, with a structured beginning and end. Tim recommended I investigate ‘Patchwork’ methodology (Cattaneo, 2014), as a creative way to engage students with writing.
These recommendations inspired the new, collage-based intervention. Writing it also brought me close to ‘pedagogies of discomfort’ (Cox, 2025): I devised something similar but different to the ‘privilege walk’, about how inequity affects us, and might be changed, collectively. I also looked at contemporary art archival practices, exploring chaos as a way of challenging power relations in institutional archives (roush, 2016).
I sought to introduce different kinds of archival/memory loss, starting with traits of students and adults with ADHD (CADDRA, 2022) then expanding from there in ways that might intersect with ‘Race’. I then sought a way through the second activity, to re-integrate these experiences in a collective action.
I am nervous about gauging how much discomfort one can introduce in a one-off session. Some revision of the new intervention might be needed on this ground, and in terms of time.
Further centring Black Students
Peers made wonderful suggestions about how better to intersect with Black student experience. I will also add these to our resource lists for future interventions/collaborations, or as resources for students.3
It might also be worth exploring “chaos” with something more celebratory – e.g. mas/the carnivalesque, as an alternative to centring around trauma. Equally, I don’t want to shy away from attempting pedagogies of discomfort.
6) Evaluation of your process – what have you learned from this process? If you were to implement it, how would you know if it’s working?
I am a kinaesthetic learner, I learn through doing. Like many of our students. So whilst I was frustrated by the limitations of my initial intervention, perhaps I had to write it and receive feedback to learn.
Perhaps I was experiencing resistance to the assignment as well? And working through that, with the feedback was part of the process? I do think I genuinely overlooked part of the instructions but is also possible I was resistant to the methodologies of intersectionality and positionality.
The collage intervention does have potential to be more engaging, to speak to aspects of ADHD and Black student experience. I still am not quite comfortable with putting it out there, but it is an attempt.
In terms of gauging its success within the classroom, I find that feedback forms are rarely helpful. I feel you must judge by how the conversation goes with the students in the space and the work that is produced. It is hard to see the results, due to the one-off nature of our sessions. We rely on verbal feedback from students and course tutors.
7) Conclusion – what are your key observations and reflections regarding this process, your positionality, and your practices?
I want to remove barriers to learning and find new ways to engage students with different lived experience to my own. There is still much to do within my context to make our teaching more inclusive. Partnering with others with different expertise, as well as educating ourselves (/myself) more, is necessary.
I also realise I need to look after myself better (particularly in terms of the day today differing demands in my work schedule). In this way, I will be in a better position to engage/focus appropriately (whether it be on assignments, or in the classroom), with care, for others. I struggle to set boundaries for myself, say yes to too much, this leads to overwhelm and overstretch, and then care-less-ness. I am still learning but can keep trying to do better.
Bibliography
Australian Disability Clearinghouse on Education and Training (ADCET), (n.d.), ‘Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)’ https://www.adcet.edu.au/inclusive-teaching/specific-disabilities/adhd Accessed 2 July 2025
Bradbury, Alice.(2020). A critical race theory framework for education policy analysis: The case of bilingual learners and assessment policy in England. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(2), pp.241-260
Canadian ADHD Resource Alliance (2020): Canadian ADHD Practice Guidelines, 4.1 Edition, Toronto ON; CADDRA, 2020.
Cattaneo, J. (2014). ‘Patchwork Writing in the Creative Arts: An Alternative to the Academic Essay’. Connectivity: Linking the Learning Community. Articles from the Learning and Teaching Conference 2012.
Crenshaw, K. (1990) Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), pp.1241-1299.
Cox, L. (14 May 2025), ‘Pedagogies of Discomfort,’ (Lecture given from University of Winchester to UAL PG Cert, Inclusive Practices Module, Online).
Davidson, N., Major, C. H., & Michaelsen, L. K. (2014). ‘Small-group learning in higher education—cooperative, collaborative, problem-based, and team-based learning: An introduction by the guest editors’. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 1-6.
Faal, B. (2009) ‘Fabric wall hanging’, artwork/archival object from the Tell Us About It archive, TU/4/2
Garrett, R. (11 Feb 2024): Racism shapes careers: career trajectories and imagined futures of racialised minority PhDs in UK higher education, Globalisation, Societies and Education, Volume 23, Issue 3, 683-697DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2024.2307886
Grout, H. (2019). ‘Archiving critically: exploring the communication of cultural biases,’ in Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, 4:1, pp.71-75
Harvard Kennedy School, (n.d.), ‘Guide to Small Group Learning,’ https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/Academic%20Dean’s%20Office/Guide%20to%20Small-Group%20Learning.pdf (Accessed 1 June 2025)
Hood, M. (2018). A Phenomenological Study: How College Students With ADHD are Affected by Fragmentation and Disassociation (Thesis, Concordia University, St. Paul). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/cup_commons_grad_edd/151
Hughes, G., Upsher, R., Nobili, A., Kirkman, A., Wilson, C., Bowers-Brown, T., Foster, J., Bradley, S., Byrom, N. (8 Feb 2022), AdvanceHE ‘Inclusivity for ADHD’ in Education Mental Health Toolkit, https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/teaching-and-learning/curricula-development/education-mental-health-toolkit/social-belonging/inclusivity-adhd Accessed 2 July 2025
also published as pdf,
Hughes et al., Education for Mental Health: Enhancing Student Mental Health through Curriculum and Pedagogy 8 Feb 2022, Advance HE.
Marima, F. (2024). ‘Body As Archive: Re-Imagination Of Identities Within Contemporary Practices Through The Lens Of The Performing (Black) African Female Body’ IMPACT Printmaking Journal, Vol 3, Issue 10. https://doi.org/10.54632/1305.IMPJ6
Oliver, M. (2004). ‘The Social Model in Action: if I had a hammer’ in Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (ed.) Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research Leeds: The Disability Press, pp. 18-31.
Roberson, B., & Franchini, B. (2014). ‘Effective task design for the TBL classroom’. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 275-302.
roush, p. (2016), ‘Chaos of Memories: Surviving Archives and the Ruins of History According to the Found Photo Foundation’, in Order and Collapse: The Lives of Archives (2016), Published by Photography at Valand Academy, University of Gothenburg, Hasselblad Foundation, Art and Theory Publishing.
Trouillot, M-R. (1995). Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History, Boston: Beacon Press
Tyrone, B. (11 September 2020) ‘How to Support Your Students with ADHD,’ Duke University Learning Innovation & Lifetime Education Blog. https://lile.duke.edu/blog/2020/09/how-to-support-your-students-with-adhd/ Accessed 2 July 2025
Universities, UK (2022) ‘Closing the Gap: Three Years On’. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/what-we-do/policy-and-research/publications/features/closing-gap-three-years Accessed 5 July 2025.
Washington University in Saint Louis, Centre for Teaching and Learning, ‘Teaching Resources: Using Roles in Group Work,’ https://ctl.wustl.edu/resources/using-roles-in-group-work/ (Accessed 4 June 2025)
Zavalaa, J., Migonib, A. A., Caswell, M., Geracid, N. and Cifore, M. (2017), ‘A process where we’re all at the table’: community archives challenging dominant modes of archival practice’ Archives and Manuscripts, 2017, VOL. 45, NO. 3, 202-215 https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1377088